HONOLULU—The City Department of Corporation Counsel issued the following statement in response to a federal judge’s preliminary ruling in an ongoing lawsuit against the Honolulu rail transit project:
“The Court’s ruling today was expected given Judge Tashima’s preliminary ruling and statements at the hearing about the limited scope of the record that at this time did not allow sufficient information for the Court to fully decide the disputed issues.
“Despite the City’s efforts to streamline the case early in the process by asking the Court to remove Plaintiffs Cayetano, Heen, Roth and the Small Business Hawaii Entrepreneurial Education Foundation, who completely failed to participate in the lengthy administrative process leading to the FTA’s approval of the project, the Court determined that the motion was premature at this stage of the case.
“Once the full administrative record for the case is compiled and made available so that it confirms that each of the four Plaintiffs did not in fact participate in the EIS process and that none of the Plaintiffs raised issues regarding a number of the properties that form the basis of certain claims in the Complaint, Defendants expect to renew the motion.”
Background & Related Stories
Related Stories
Jul 13 2011 by Letter to the Editor
Aug 01 2011 by Hawaii Independent Staff
Aug 01 2011 by Hawaii Independent Staff
Aug 15 2011 by Hawaii Independent Staff
Aug 15 2011 by Letter to the Editor
Aug 26 2011 by Hawaii Independent Staff
Oct 27 2011 by Jamie Winpenny
Dec 12 2011 by Panos Prevedouros
Dec 12 2011 by Hawaii Independent Staff
Dec 13 2011 by Hawaii Independent Staff
Jan 23 2012 by Hawaii Independent Staff
Mar 14 2012 by Hawaii Independent Staff
Mar 25 2012 by Ben Cayetano
